Consider `OstreeRef`, `OstreeConfig`, and other models artifactless
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Task
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 60
- Forks
- 47
- Avg merge
- 23h 8m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
It is not necessary to store the checksum of a commit or a couple of lines for a configuration in a separate file. Use TextField instead.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the model definitions for OstreeRef and OstreeConfig, then inspect how their commit checksums and configuration content are currently stored. Determine which other models are covered by the request; done means the applicable data uses TextField rather than separate artifact files and the relevant tests pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend, database
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100