pulp / pulp/pulp_deb

Add option to publish using "No-Support-for-Architecture-all: Packages" repo format

Open
#447 11 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

.feature Looking_for_Contributor
Dominant language
Python
Stars
71
Forks
91
Avg merge
1d 19h
Merged PRs (30d)
22

Description

Currently pulp_deb always publishes only separate Architecture = all package indices. This is considered the best practice format, but it is not a format used by any official Debian repos. Instead those use the No-Support-for-Architecture-all: Packages format for more backwards compatibility (for example for Debian bullseye).

I consider it dangerous to exclusively use a format not used by anyone in the wild.

The proposal would be to add a option to publish in the "No-Support-for-Architecture-all: Packages" style.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files or tests are named. Start by locating pulp_deb's publishing implementation and its existing architecture-index handling, then trace how a publication format option would be configured. Done means an option can select the “No-Support-for-Architecture-all: Packages” format without removing the current behavior, with coverage for both formats.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend, release
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.