prometheus / prometheus/client_python
`InfoMetricFamily`’s `add_metric()` parameters are strangely named and should provide default values
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 4.4k
- Forks
- 876
- Avg merge
- 8d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hey.
I was looking into InfoMetricFamily’s add_metric() and I either I just don't get it or the API is a bit strange.
With an Info object I'd have done something like this:
m = prometheus_client.Info("logical_drive", "foobar", ("controller_name",
"array_name",
"logical_drive_name",
"caching",
"device",
"raid_level",
"logical_drive_label",
"multidomain_status",
"parity_initialization_status",
"status"
)
)
and then set it like:
m.labels(controller_name=controller_name, array_name=array_name, logical_drive_name=logical_drive_name,
**{n: logical_drive_properties.get(n, "") for n in (
"device",
"raid_level",
"logical_drive_label",
"multidomain_status",
"parity_initialization_status",
"status"
)
},
caching=bool_or_none_to_label_value( logical_drive_properties.get("caching") )
)
(here an example where I set some of the properties directly, and some via dict unpacking)
- It would fail if I forgot a label.
- I could use label names as attribute names, like
controller_name=rather than"controller_name"=... which is however not super important
With InfoMetricFamily seem quite a bit different:
add_metric()now has the parameterslabelsandvalue.- As far as I understand the code,
labelsare actually not labels, but values for these, namely the ones set withlabelsin the constructor ofInfoMetricFamily. - It's no longer possible to give
labelsasdict, one really needs to give them in the right order as sequence. Why doesInfoallow that but not this? - AFAICS, there is no check if exactly those labels are set, that were given in the constructor. Why over at
Infobut not here? What sense does it then even make to set the labels in the constructor? valueis misleading in so many ways. It's not the value of the metric (that is1) and even if it relates to the labels being the “value”, then it should bevalues.- It might have perhaps even been better to swap the two names... or rater use some completely different names.
Anyway... guess this can't be changed now without breaking the ABI.
However, as far as I understand the code:
https://github.com/prometheus/client_python/blob/09a5ae30602a7a81f6174dae4ba08b93ee7feed2/prometheus_client/metrics_core.py#L372
the idea is one can give labels and/or value and both are merged in a final dict of label/value pairs.... but then it would be nice if labels and value were not required.
Why not simply give them default values () respectively {}?
I could provide a patch if nothing speaks against that particular change. But the above points are IMO still problematic. Especially also that the behaviour is considerable different from Info, which is not really obvious.
Cheers,
Chris.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked InfoMetricFamily.add_metric() implementation in prometheus_client/metrics_core.py around line 372, then compare its parameter handling with Info. Confirm the intended defaults and compatibility implications for labels and value; done means an agreed API change is implemented without breaking existing callers and its behavior is covered by tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- observability-sre
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100