processone / processone/fast_xml
Support for dirty scheduler
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Erlang
- Stars
- 137
- Forks
- 44
- Avg merge
- 3d 57m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
I was wondering if it makes sense to add support for dirty schedulers and if so, if you have any plans for do it?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are identified in the issue. Start by determining the intended dirty-scheduler behavior and the affected integration points, then define tests and acceptance criteria before implementation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- erlang
- Domain
- backend, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100