practicalli / practicalli/clojure
ancestors
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Makefile
- Stars
- 117
- Forks
- 36
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
(ancestors clojure.lang.Cons)
#{clojure.lang.ISeq clojure.lang.Sequential java.io.Serializable clojure.lang.IPersistentCollection clojure.lang.ASeq java.lang.Iterable clojure.lang.IObj clojure.lang.Seqable java.util.Collection java.lang.Object clojure.lang.Obj clojure.lang.IHashEq java.util.List clojure.lang.IMeta}
Cons is a lot of things -- including an IPersistentCollection but not an IPersistentList
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the shown (ancestors clojure.lang.Cons) result and compare its interfaces with the issue's observation about IPersistentCollection and IPersistentList. No file, test, entry point, or requested change is named, so clarify whether the intended outcome is an explanation or a code/documentation update before proceeding.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- clojure
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100