practicalli / practicalli/clojure
assoc performance
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
performance
- Dominant language
- Makefile
- Stars
- 117
- Forks
- 36
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The 3-arity version of assoc is usually faster than the var-arg version.
On hot paths it may help a bit to use
(-> {} (assoc k1 v1) (assoc k2 v2))
vs
(assoc {} k1 v1 k2 v2)
#clojure https://t.co/RT1KqhOwRE
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No source file, test, or entry point is named. Start by benchmarking the two assoc forms shown in the issue and locate the relevant Clojure implementation or usage in this repository. Done should include a reproducible performance result and a clearly scoped decision about whether a repository change is warranted.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- clojure
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100