practicalli / practicalli/clojure
convert all values in a map that are keyword into nil
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Makefile
- Stars
- 117
- Forks
- 36
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
(clojure.walk/walk (fn [[k v :as m]] (if (keyword? v) [k nil] m)) identity {:valor 10 :teste :v})
it’s possible to make it work with clojure.walk, here is a Specter solution just for fun:
(def recurse-maps
(recursive-path [] p
(if-path map?
[MAP-VALS p]
STAY)))
user=> (setval [recurse-maps keyword?] nil {:a :b :c 1 :d {:a :b :c 1 :d {:a nil :b :c}}})
{:a nil, :c 1, :d {:a nil, :c 1, :d {:a nil, :b nil}}}
Or using postwalk
(fn [form]
(prn form)
(if (and (map-entry? form) (keyword? (second form)))
[(first form) nil]
form))
{:a 10 :b {:c :to-nil :d 73 :f {:x :bad :y :bad}}})```
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No repository file, test, or entry point is identified. Start by locating the relevant map-walking examples or tests, then compare the requested nested-map behavior with the provided clojure.walk, postwalk, and Specter examples; done should include a clear repository location and expected output.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- clojure
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100