potassco / potassco/constraint-handler

type_checking unit test might be missing some none-related tests

Open
#182 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Python
Stars
3
Forks
0
Avg merge
1d 19h
Merged PRs (30d)
20

Description

  • The variable none_bool is declared but not used anywhere (unlikethe variables none_bool(1) and none_bool(2) that seem to be used once)
  • I didn't see any connection between the none_bool stuff and the .expected files, but I might have missed something.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Locate the type_checking unit test and inspect where none_bool, none_bool(1), and none_bool(2) are declared or used. Trace how the test relates to the .expected files, then compare the existing cases with the intended none-related coverage. Done means the missing or unused test coverage is identified and the expected outputs are consistent.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
testing-qa
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.