posit-dev / posit-dev/content-switcher
Stretch Goals / Post-Sprint Work
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Lua
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 4m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
Stretch Goals / Post-Sprint Work
These items are nice-to-haves that will likely be too much work for the 2-week sprint. If time permits during the sprint, great! Otherwise, these should be prioritized as post-sprint work.
1. Documentation Updates
- Update README with latest features and configuration options
- Add troubleshooting section
- Document any breaking changes or migration notes
- Add contribution guidelines
- Update installation instructions if needed
2. Example Updates
- Ensure example.qmd demonstrates all features
- Add examples for edge cases
- Create additional example files for different use cases (e.g., multi-language docs, version-specific tutorials)
- Add visual examples/screenshots to README
3. Release Preparation
- Version bump (follow semantic versioning)
- Create/update CHANGELOG.md with all changes
- Create GitHub release with release notes
- Tag release in git
- Verify release artifacts
- Announce release (if applicable)
4. Automated Tests (Optional but valuable)
- Unit tests for JavaScript functionality
- Test content switching logic
- Test localStorage persistence
- Test URL parameter handling
- Set up CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions)
- Add test coverage reporting
Note: These are lower priority than the core sprint work. Focus on Issues #8, #5, #6, #7, #10, and #9 first. Only tackle these if sprint work is completed ahead of schedule.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
This issue is a backlog spanning README updates, example.qmd, CHANGELOG.md, release tasks, JavaScript tests, and GitHub Actions rather than one defined change. Start by selecting and separately scoping one checklist area; review the named file or workflow, and consider it done only when that area's checklist items and verification are complete.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- git, github-actions, javascript
- Domain
- ci-cd, content, documentation, release, testing-qa
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 18/100