Maybe unsound in RLocal::new

Hello, thank you for your contribution in this project, I am scanning the unsoundness problem in rust project.
I notice the following code:

pub struct RLocal<T: Copy> {
    old_value: T,
    variable: *mut T,
}

impl<T> RLocal<T>
where
    T: Copy,
{
    pub fn new(new_value: T, variable: *mut T) -> RLocal<T> {
        unsafe {
            let old_value = libr::get(variable);
            libr::set(variable, new_value);

            Self {
                old_value,
                variable,
            }
        }
    }
}

Considering that pub mod raii, and new is also a pub function. I assume that users can directly call this function. This potential situation could result in libr::get being called to a null pointer, and might trigger undefined behavior (UB). For safety reasons, I felt it necessary to report this issue. If you have performed checks elsewhere that ensure this is safe, please don’t take offense at my raising this issue.
I suggest Several possible fixes:

1. If there is no external usage for RLocal or new, they should not marked as pub, at least its new should not marked as pub
2. new method should add additional check for null pointer.
3. mark new method as unsafe and proper doc to let users know that they should provide valid Pointers.

Start by locating the public raii module and RLocal::new, then inspect callers and the pointer assumptions around libr::get and libr::set. Determine whether the API can receive a null or otherwise invalid pointer; done means the safety contract or visibility is unambiguous and the reported undefined-behavior path is addressed.