Better Handling of Formatting Anonymous Functions that are Piped to?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 446
- Forks
- 32
- Avg merge
- 16h 48m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Hello,
I was wondering if there air could better format the following piece of code?
correction_factor <- fitted.values(mod) |>
{\(y_hat) (exp(y_hat) - 1)}() |>
{\(y_hat_back_transformed) {
lm(df$deaths ~ y_hat_back_transformed - 1)
}}() |>
{\(fitted_model) coef(fitted_model)}() |>
{\(named_coef) unname(named_coef)}()
I'm running air 0.7.0 and it formats it this way, which I think is arguably harder to read because there's so much clutter separating the informative pieces of information
correction_factor <- fitted.values(mod) |>
{
\(y_hat) (exp(y_hat) - 1)
}() |>
{
\(y_hat_back_transformed) {
lm(df$deaths ~ y_hat_back_transformed - 1)
}
}() |>
{
\(fitted_model) coef(fitted_model)
}() |>
{
\(named_coef) unname(named_coef)
}()
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the R snippet in the issue and reproduce the current formatter output using air 0.7.0 or the repository's formatter entry point. Compare the requested pipe formatting with the existing output and define the desired result so the anonymous functions no longer add unnecessary visual clutter. Done means the formatter produces the improved layout consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100