porsager / porsager/postgres-shift
Do per-migration transactions (instead of one transaction for all needed migrations)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 56
- Forks
- 15
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I have run into an issue where I add an additional value to an enum, but I cannot use that value in subsequent migrations because all needed migrations run in a single transaction.
Would there be any problem in making a transaction per migration instead?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file or test is named in the issue. Start by tracing how postgres-shift runs all needed migrations and where the transaction begins and ends; confirm that each migration gets its own transaction and that a later migration can use an enum value added by an earlier one.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript, postgres
- Domain
- database
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100