Does your README.md's cache setup equivalent to actions/setup-node@v3 cache setup
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 1.3k
- Forks
- 217
- Avg merge
- 8h 42m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
I see two cache setups (one here and the other on setup-node) and I'm unsure which one is the latest or if either made a difference.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the cache setup in README.md and compare it with the linked actions/setup-node advanced-usage documentation. Confirm whether the two setups are equivalent or differ, then update README.md with the current recommendation and explanation. Done means the cache guidance is unambiguous and reflects the current GitHub Actions behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions, node.js
- Domain
- ci-cd, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100