marker pixel size mapping could be improved
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- MATLAB
- Stars
- 413
- Forks
- 166
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
N = 10;
x = linspace(1, 10, 10);
hold on
clr1 = [133, 20, 75]/255;
plot(x, y, '.', x, mean(y'), 'linewidth', 2, 'MarkerSize', 10, 'Color', clr1);
plot(x, mean(y'), '.', 'MarkerSize', 32, 'Color', clr1)
fig2plotly(gcf, 'strip', false)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the MATLAB example with fig2plotly(gcf, 'strip', false), focusing on the differing MarkerSize values of 10 and 32. Trace where marker pixel sizes are converted during export; done means the generated Plotly visualization maps the MATLAB marker sizes more appropriately.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- matlab, plotly
- Domain
- data-visualization
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100