Better rangeslider positioning
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 18.3k
- Forks
- 2k
- Avg merge
- 2d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 28
Description
As mentioned by @PavelGolodoniuc in #2443, rangesliders don't have very flexible positioning - they always go right below the associated axis (and tick labels if they're shown) and you can set their thickness as a fraction of plot area, but perhaps we could allow them to get a full domain: [bottom, top] or even domain: {x: [left, right], y: [bottom, top]} so you can control the width too, not be restricted to the same width as the x axis.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names rangeslider positioning and references #2443, but no implementation files, tests, or entry points. Start by reading #2443 and tracing the rangeslider layout code; done means supporting configurable vertical and horizontal domains without restricting the slider to the associated axis width.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- data-visualization
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100