Review all panic usages for upgrade compatibility and error handling
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 56
- Forks
- 63
- Avg merge
- 2d 20h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 34
Description
We should review all places in the project where panic is used. The goal is to evaluate whether each usage is reasonable and whether it could cause issues during rolling upgrades or future version compatibility.
Tasks:
1. Identify all occurrences of panic across the codebase.
2. Review each case to determine if it’s necessary or if it should be replaced with proper error handling.
3. Identify which panic usages are acceptable (e.g., truly unrecoverable states).
4. Propose improvements or refactoring where needed to ensure safe rolling upgrades and backward compatibility.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Search the Go codebase for every panic usage and read each surrounding call path. Review whether each case is acceptable during rolling upgrades and future compatibility, or needs error handling. Done means every occurrence is assessed, acceptable cases are identified, and proposed refactoring is documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- go
- Domain
- backend, distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100