osl_generic_count / osl_generic_number duplicate
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C
- Stars
- 32
- Forks
- 15
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
These two functions do exactly the same thing. On the linguistic basis, I prefer 'number' to 'count'. Any objections?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Inspect the definitions and references to osl_generic_count and osl_generic_number to determine whether they are identical and which name is used elsewhere. Resolve the naming choice, update affected references, and verify that the duplicate API is no longer present.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- c
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100