An "Author" section
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 4
- Avg merge
- 3h 54m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
One of the review comments is:
Data citation (giving credit) is an important part of open science practice. Do you plan to explicitly support or model these kinds of relations in you configuration files, especially with project modifiers and re-combination of PEPs?
I was wondering if we should add an 'author' block in the pep specification. Or, perhaps this should be an extension and we can write a separate tool that reads and parses such an authorship block?
Thoughts @afrendeiro or @johanneskoester?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the PEP specification and its configuration-file model, then compare an explicit author block with an extension or separate tool. Resolve how authorship, data citation, project modifiers, and PEP recombination should be represented. Done means the chosen approach is agreed and documented in the specification or a defined extension.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100