pepkit / pepkit/peprs

Goal: integrate `peprs` into PEPATAC and other packages

Open
#14 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

integration
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
3
Forks
0
Avg merge
1d 14h
Merged PRs (30d)
2

Description

It would be cool to show that we can effectively "replace" peppy in PEPATAC with peprs. That would be a good benchmark to hit I think to show feasibility and feature parity at least initially

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by examining how PEPATAC currently uses peppy and how peprs exposes equivalent functionality. Compare the required behavior and feature parity across PEPATAC and the other packages mentioned. Done means demonstrating a workable peprs-based replacement or documenting the remaining compatibility gaps.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.