patrick-kidger / patrick-kidger/jaxtyping

Provide a way to get error diagnostics out of isinstance checks

Open
#167 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

feature
Dominant language
Python
Stars
1.9k
Forks
96
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

The assert isinstance(...) pattern prints a mostly useless message, just "AssertionError" without explanation. Would it be possible to expose an assertIsInstance(x, ty) API that prints expected versus actual, like we get for errors in the function arguments?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the existing handling for function-argument type errors and the current assert isinstance(...) pattern. Trace how an assertIsInstance(x, ty) API could fit that reporting path; done means the API exposes expected-versus-actual diagnostics instead of only AssertionError.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
testing
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
38/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.