patrick-kidger / patrick-kidger/diffrax

Even better Implicit Runge--Kutta methods

Open
#259 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

refactor
Dominant language
Python
Stars
2.1k
Forks
189
Avg merge
3d 18h
Merged PRs (30d)
1

Description

There's a few things we could do to tidy up their implementation even further. Most of these are primarily considered in the FIRK case, so it might need some thinking to generalise them to the general implicit case.

  • Iterate closer to zero. See (8.1) of Hairer & Wanner.
  • Smarter stage-value predictors using interpolation. See (8.5') of Hairer & Wanner.
  • Transform linear problems into Hessenberg form. See (8.15) of Hairer & Wanner.
  • Stiff error estimators: adjust the error estimators of implicit solvers to depend on the implicit problems being solved. See (8.19) and (8.20) of Hairer & Wanner.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Locate the existing implicit Runge–Kutta implementation and first understand how the FIRK and general implicit cases are structured. Read the cited Hairer & Wanner sections (8.1, 8.5', 8.15, 8.19, and 8.20), then determine which improvements can be scoped and tested independently. Done would require agreed behavior and validation for the selected solver improvements.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.