Introduce PR review policy

New Feature / Enhancement Checklist

• I am not disclosing a vulnerability.
• I am not just asking a question.
• I have searched through existing issues.

Current Limitation

Active contributors are the heart beat of any open source project. As such, their contributions and investments of time deserve timely feedback.

Currently there is no guideline regarding PR reviews that determines the time frame in which PRs are reviewed and feedback is given. This leads to:

• Additional work for PR author to resolve merge conflicts due to regular PRs, e.g. Snyk.
• Contributors may become demotivated by not getting a review within reasonable amount of time; a review takes maybe 5-15 minutes while a PR often takes hours of work.
• Improvements of product, docs and frameworks are unnecessarily delayed.
• PRs are more likely to be abandoned due to low feedback frequency.

It is also not clear who to tag for review, as there are multiple members in each repo group, some of which do not seem to be active anymore.

Feature / Enhancement Description

• Introduce a review policy that aims to provide feedback on PRs within a defined amount of time.
• Actively recruit and onboard new repo team members to increase review capacity.
• Update team members of repo group, e.g. @ parse-community/server and set a guideline to tag the server group instead of individual members, so that review load is better distributed among reviewers.

Example Use Case

(none)

Alternatives / Workarounds

(none)

3rd Party References

(none)

Start by reviewing the repository's contribution and security guidance, including SECURITY.md and the linked support guidance, then examine how the @parse-community/server repo group is maintained. Define the review response timeframe, reviewer-tagging guidance, and team-member onboarding expectations, and document the policy where contributors can find it.