pantheon-systems / pantheon-systems/plugin-release-actions

Is it possible to avoid gh_token as an input param?

Open
#4 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

question
Dominant language
Shell
Stars
2
Forks
1
Avg merge
13h 6m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

(possibly a future investigation) Is this something that we can set and use the default built-in token if no other provided, or does the calling workflow need to set it?

Originally posted by @pwtyler in https://github.com/pantheon-systems/plugin-release-actions/pull/1#discussion_r1433122864

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Review the repository's GitHub Actions workflow inputs and the calling workflow configuration, then compare gh_token with GitHub's built-in token behavior. Confirm whether omitting gh_token works without caller changes and document the required configuration or update the issue with a decision.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
github-actions, shell
Domain
ci-cd, release
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.