palladius / palladius/rubycon.it

Inconsistent timings for the schedule

Open Beginner friendly
#87 6 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
HTML
Stars
3
Forks
5
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

Problem:
The current schedule has highly inconsistent talk durations and some unrealistically short breaks, which creates confusion for speakers preparing their talks and discomfort for attendees:

  • Inconsistent Talk Durations: Ranged seemingly at random from 30m, 35m, 40m, to 45m.
  • Unrealistic Coffee Break: The morning coffee break was listed as lasting only 5 minutes (from 11:15 to 11:20), which is impossible for attendees to actually get coffee and return.

Proposed Solution:
Standardize the schedule ensuring all speakers get between 35 and 45 minutes slots, coffee breaks are no longer than 15 minutes, lightning talks expanded to a full hour, and Piadina wrap is shranked to 20m.

Event Old Schedule Start Old Duration New Schedule Start New Duration
Check-in 08:30 60m 08:30 60m
Welcome 09:30 15m 09:30 15m
Keynote (Carmine) 09:45 45m 09:45 45m
Talk 1 (Julia) 10:30 45m 10:30 40m
☕️ Break 11:15 5m 11:10 15m
Talk 2 (Silvano) 11:20 35m 11:25 40m
Talk 3 (André) 11:55 30m 12:05 40m
🍝 Lunch Break 12:25 90m 12:45 75m
⚡️ Lightning Talks 13:55 50m 14:00 60m
Talk 4 (Michele) 14:45 35m 15:00 35m
Talk 5 (Akira) 15:20 30m 15:35 35m
☕ Break 15:50 20m 16:10 15m
Talk 6 (Marco) 16:10 35m 16:25 35m
Talk 7 (Yara) 16:45 45m 17:00 40m
Wrap (Riccardo) 17:30 30m 17:40 20m
Drinks 18:00 120m 18:00 120m

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No file or test is named in the issue. Find the repository content that renders the event schedule, compare it with the proposed new timings in the issue, update the schedule entries, and verify that the displayed agenda matches the table and remains chronologically consistent.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
html
Domain
content
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
2/5
Estimated time
1-3 hours
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.