palantir / palantir/palantir-java-format
Format type annotation as part of the type
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 907
- Forks
- 101
- Avg merge
- 1d 3h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 19
Description
In 2022, I opened #805 to fix incorrect formatting of type annotations (by cherry-picking a commit from google-java-format, thus reducing the difference between the two formatters). No one got back to me, and I assumed that palantir-java-format was a dead project. Is the project still open to such a pull request? What is the status of tracking upstream improvements to google-java-format (while retaining the documented differences in palantir-java-format)?
Thanks.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing issue #805 and the relationship between palantir-java-format and google-java-format. Determine whether the proposed type-annotation formatting change is still wanted and how upstream improvements should be tracked while preserving documented differences; the issue is complete when that scope and project status are decided.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100