oxidecomputer / oxidecomputer/omicron

tracking issue: instance restart behavior during upgrade

Open
#9,094 1 comment 0 reactions 1 assignee View on GitHub

@hawkw is already working on this.

Since Sep 26, 2025.

Dominant language
Rust
Stars
572
Forks
97
Avg merge
2d 12h
Merged PRs (30d)
96

Description

I'll start with the action plan and add a comment later with some discussion.

Short-term (R17):

These are longer-term goals that aren't specific enough to make tasks yet:

  • Instances should not be restarted at all for system upgrades. We have long planned to use live migration to avoid this.
  • Whether we do live migration or use instance restarts, we could make allocation choices more intelligently to minimize the number of instance movements required. (e.g., prefer to move instances to sleds that have already been updated). This is much harder than it sounds. See RFD 564.
  • #9458: Even when we have to restart instances to move them, we could do so in the same coordinated way that we plan to use live migration for. This would leverage the same work and also make sure that we don't cooldown instances when they fail because of the upgrade.
  • Instances should not be cooled down for "start" failures that can't be its fault (e.g., failure to start on a sled due to the sled not having sync'd time, or not having U2 devices, etc.). @jgallagher is filing a separate issue on this shortly. This isn't really upgrade-related but we hit it during upgrade testing and it contributed to instance unavailability.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.