oxidecomputer / oxidecomputer/crucible

a follow-up issue to track the question of retries in general.

Open
#452 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Rust
Stars
260
Forks
34
Avg merge
2d 1h
Merged PRs (30d)
8

Description

This is a tracking issue to come back and look at the retries in the scrubber.

Originally posted by @jmpesp in https://github.com/oxidecomputer/crucible/pull/432#pullrequestreview-1115541336

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the scrubber implementation and reviewing the linked pull request #432, especially the discussion that prompted this tracking issue. The issue does not define the retry behavior, affected files, tests, or completion criteria, so those requirements need to be established before implementation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
backend
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.