owlcollab / owlcollab/owltools
FastOwlSim's SimGIC scoring discrepancy
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 115
- Forks
- 34
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
SimGIC score calculated using FastOwlSim doesn't match among output files written in FORMATTED and CSV formats. However, SimGIC calculated using SimpleOwlSim matches with that calculated using FastOwlSim in output format FORMATTED.
Input owl file: simont.owl
Properties file: properties.txt
General command used: owltools simont.owl --fsim-basic -p properties.txt -o out.txt
- Using fsim-basic and output format as CSV: out-fsim-basic_csv.txt
- Using fsim-basic and output format as FORMATTED: out-fsim-basic_formatted.txt
- Using sim-basic and output format as CSV: out-sim-basic_csv.txt
In both above csv files, I assume values in the last column as SimGIC scores (column titles don't align with those values, or else column title was missing).
Why do scores differ depending on file format? Besides presumed code refactoring, is there any difference between scoring methodology used in FastOwlSim and SimpleOwlSim?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by running the reported owltools simont.owl --fsim-basic -p properties.txt -o out.txt command with the linked simont.owl and properties.txt inputs. Compare the CSV and FORMATTED outputs, including their column headings and final values, with the provided reference files; done means the output formats agree on SimGIC scores and any remaining FastOwlSim/SimpleOwlSim difference is explained or corrected.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100