oss-slu / oss-slu/DigitalBoneBox
Feedback & Review: User Experience and Content Accuracy
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 18
- Avg merge
- 8h 17m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
Goal / Objective
Our goal is to ensure the DigitalBoneBox application is not only functional but also accurate, intuitive, and easy for a student to use. This task is focused on reviewing the application from a user's perspective to identify areas for improvement in both the user experience and the anatomical content. No coding is required for this issue.
Tasks to be Completed
Review the Application's User Flow:
Follow the setup instructions in the README.md to run the application locally.
Use the application as a first-time user would. Navigate through the "Bony Pelvis" boneset, selecting different bones and sub-bones.
Document any part of the process that feels confusing, difficult, or unintuitive. Is it clear what to do next? Are the buttons and menus easy to understand?
Verify Content Accuracy:
Read through the descriptions for the "Bony Pelvis" and its sub-bones as they appear in the application.
Check for any spelling or grammatical errors.
If you have knowledge of human anatomy, please check the descriptions for factual accuracy. Are the statements correct? Is any critical information missing?
Provide Feedback on the UI:
Look at the overall design. Is the text easy to read? Are the colors clear? Is the layout well-organized?
Take notes on any visual elements that could be improved.
Summarize Your Findings:
Create a new comment on this issue with a summary of your feedback. Please organize your notes into sections (e.g., "User Flow Feedback," "Content Corrections," "UI Suggestions").
Acceptance Criteria
[ ] The application has been thoroughly reviewed from a user's perspective.
[ ] A detailed feedback summary has been posted as a comment on this issue.
[ ] The summary includes specific, actionable suggestions for improvement.
Additional Context
This is one of the most valuable contributions we can get! Your feedback will directly help us make the application a better study tool for students. Thank you for your help!
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Follow README.md to run the application locally, then review the Bony Pelvis boneset and its sub-bones as a first-time user. Check the user flow, UI readability, and anatomical descriptions for confusing behavior, language errors, and factual issues. Done means posting a structured issue comment with specific findings under sections such as User Flow Feedback, Content Corrections, and UI Suggestions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript
- Domain
- content, frontend
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100