Is "Empty" the best flavour name when a book has no flavour
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
question
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 1
- Avg merge
- 15h 20m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 18
Description
When a book has no flavour, we currently display "Empty" as flavour name, since "" is a bit too rough.
I'm not that convinced about "Empty" label, but I don't feel like "No Flavour" is really superior (a "No flavour" flavour is probably even more weird than "Empty" flavour).
Someone has a better idea?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file or test is named. Find where a book with no flavour is rendered and inspect the current "Empty" label and its surrounding UI; agree on replacement wording, then verify the chosen label appears correctly for flavourless books.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- content, frontend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100