worldbank_debarred: the "Other Sanctions" table on the same page is not crawled

The crawler reads only the JSON feed at apigwext.worldbank.org/.../SANCTIONED_FIRM, which carries debarments and cross-debarments (INELIG_FLG D and X). The same page publishes a second, hand-maintained HTML table headed "Other Sanctions", holding the sanctions the World Bank imposes short of debarment: conditional non-debarment, letter of reprimand and restitution. None of those rows appear in the JSON feed, so they are missing from the dataset entirely.

The clearest example is IQVIA Consulting and Information Services India, sanctioned with conditional non-debarment from June 17, 2025 to December 16, 2026 for Fraudulent Practices, as the result of a settlement agreement. It has no record in OpenSanctions at all:

GET /search/default?q=IQVIA+Consulting+and+Information+Services+India  ->  0 results

and it is genuinely absent from the feed the crawler reads:

curl -s 'https://apigwext.worldbank.org/dvsvc/v1.0/json/APPLICATION/ADOBE_EXPRNCE_MGR/FIRM/SANCTIONED_FIRM' \
  -H 'apikey: z9duUaFUiEUYSHs97CU38fcZO7ipOPvm' \
  | jq '[.response.ZPROCSUPP[] | select(.SUPP_NAME | test("IQVIA";"i"))] | length'
0

The table as published today is four rows:

Of those, TPF Getinsa is separately debarred and so is already in the dataset (footnote *59 spells out that it remains debarred with conditions through November 28, 2027 under Decision No. 134). "OAO Armada" appears to be a different entity from the listed "OOO ARMADA CENTER". IQVIA and PT. Bumirejo have no record at all.

Two things that seem worth deciding if you pick this up:

1. A conditional non-debarment or a letter of reprimand is not a debarment, and the firm stays eligible for Bank financing. Emitting these into worldbank_debarred under the debarment topic would overstate them, so a separate dataset or at least a distinct topic looks more accurate.
2. The table is hand maintained and the published HTML carries typos ("Feberuary", "Non-debarmen"), so a parser should not key on exact strings for the sanction type.

Happy to open a PR if that is useful.

Start at the worldbank_debarred crawler and its current JSON-feed entry point, then compare its output with the World Bank's hand-maintained "Other Sanctions" table. Decide whether these records need a separate dataset or topic, accounting for conditional non-debarment and reprimands. Done means the relevant sanctions are represented without overstating them as debarments, including coverage for IQVIA and PT. Bumirejo.