openrewrite / openrewrite/rewrite-static-analysis
Use dedicated Optionals for primitives
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
recipe
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 62
- Forks
- 112
- Avg merge
- 1d 19h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 40
Description
Optional<Long> longValue;
Optional<Integer> number;
Optional<Double> doubleOtional;
OptionalLong longValue;
OptionalInt number;
OptionalDouble doubleOtional;
Relevant : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33190768/optionalint-vs-optionalinteger
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by searching the repository for the analysis or recipe that handles boxed Optional, Optional, and Optional declarations. Compare its existing behavior with Java's OptionalLong, OptionalInt, and OptionalDouble, then verify the relevant recipe tests or add coverage showing that primitive wrappers are replaced with dedicated optionals.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- devtools
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100