Some measure properties in the database are wrong
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 16
- Forks
- 50
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Examples :
name min max higherIsBetter
f_measure 0 0 1
precision 0 0 1
recall 0 0 1
While many more are missing (somewhat less of a problem). Examples :
binominal_test
chi-squared
cortana_quality
information_gain
jaccard
os_information
positives
probability
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by locating the server-api database definitions for measure properties, then compare their name, min, max, and higherIsBetter values with the listed examples and identify the missing measures; done means the incorrect metadata is corrected and the missing entries are represented consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100