Allow for custom evaluation procedures
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 16
- Forks
- 50
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Based on this thread. We should discuss whether we want to allow people to create custom evaluation procedures (e.g., “30 times 3-fold Crossvalidation”) and how we want to support this. Possible concerns include spotty availability (might not support the entire tasktype x procedure matrix) and splintering experimental results. But there are of course also obvious benefits :)
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the linked Slack thread and the server's existing evaluation-procedure handling; the issue names no files or tests. A decision on whether and how custom procedures are supported, including availability across task types and consistency of experimental results, would define what done looks like.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- backend-api-design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100