As an editor working in a team, I want to be anonymous until peer review is complete

User story
As a senior editor with an established reputation in my field, if I give constructive criticism on a manuscript submitted to my journal, the author usually respects it and is willing to revise accordingly. However, I often assign submissions to junior editors to manage peer review, and I have seen this introduce unneeded drama and doubt, because authors can find issue with the individual editor in order to disagree with the assessment of their work, even if the assessment is sound.

Describe the solution you'd like
We'd like the editor's name to be concealed until peer review is complete. This would entail hiding some metadata in the author's article status view as well as making sure the editor's name wasn't in emails sent during revision requests.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Communicating through the senior editor's account, but this is cumbersome and keeps us from managing editor assignments through Janeway.

Start by tracing the author's article status view and the emails sent during revision requests, since the issue identifies both as places where the editor's name must be concealed. Done means the editor remains anonymous in those contexts until peer review is complete while editor assignments continue to work through Janeway.