Preprints: Authors shouldn't be able to update / upload new version of rejected preprint

Describe the bug
An author is able to update a preprint that has been rejected, and moderators are able to act on those updates.

Janeway version
Janeway 1.4.x Preprints

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Reject a non-published preprint.
2. Log into the submitting author account
3. See that submitting author can successfully update the preprint (e.g. add a new verison)
4. As moderator/admin, go to versions awaiting moderation and open the new version of the rejected preprint
5. Approve the new version
6. Encounter server error
7. View item metadata and see the new updates
8. View the log and see no entry of the new version submission or approval

Expected behavior
Submitting author cannot make edits to a rejected preprint. They must either request that moderator/admin unreject preprint or make a new preprint submission.

Any newly submitted or approved versions would be displayed in logs

Screenshots

Server error upon accepting new version of rejected preprint:

Updated title displays:

Log (admin unrejected preprint on same date as above screenshots for demonstration purposes):

Start by reproducing the rejected-preprint workflow described in the issue: reject a non-published preprint, submit a new version as its author, then try to moderate it. Trace the author update and version-approval paths. Done means rejected preprints cannot be edited or versioned, approval does not produce a server error, and valid submissions and approvals appear in the logs.