openid / openid/dchp

CDDL uses a mix of snake case and camel case

Open
#58 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

editorial naming
Dominant language
Python
Stars
19
Forks
3
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

From today's WG call:

e.g. https://openid.github.io/dchp/digital-credentials-harmonized-presentation-editors-copy.html#section-10.1

ScenarioSets, encryption_context, extensionSdJwt vs ExtensionSdwJwt

Martijn believes he didn't do this intentionally.

We should pick one and use it consistently. Please suggest which one makes the most sense.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with section 10.1 of the linked DCHP document and review the CDDL names cited in the issue: ScenarioSets, encryption_context, extensionSdJwt, and ExtensionSdwJwt. Check the surrounding specification for other naming patterns, then document the chosen convention and update inconsistent names consistently across the relevant CDDL.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
documentation
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.