A vocabulary section is missing
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 19
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Each definition should be written in accordance with clause 16.5.6 from ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2:
6.5.6 Definitions
The definition shall be written in such a form that it can replace the term in its context. It shall not start with an article (“the”, “a”)
nor end with a full stop. A definition shall not take the form of, or contain, a requirement.
Only one definition per terminological entry is allowed. If a term is used to define more than one concept, a separate terminological entry
shall be created for each concept and the domain shall be included in angle brackets before the definition.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no file, test, or entry point. First locate the repository's vocabulary or terminology section, then compare its entries with the cited ISO/IEC definition rules; done means the missing section is present and its definitions follow those rules.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100