[S2S] Determine the correct document structure for Server-to-Server and Canonical VCI
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 125
- Forks
- 41
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
The initial draft is created as a parallel document without direct dependencies between the two. Before S2S Implementors Draft 1, we should determine the correct document structure to have. We expect there to be many shared structures and features between the two as they are functionally performing the same operation (issuing credentials to a Wallet)
Options are:
- Two documents that define separate but equivalent structures
- Three documents, Canonical VCI, S2S VCI and VCI Primitives/Building Blocks
- Two documents: Canoncial VCI refactored to allow reference to , and S2S VCI referencing building blocks
- One document structured so the primitives are the same and then S2S and Canonical describe how they are used in their two contexts
See #754 for a list of the shared features between the two approaches.
I would prefer not 1, leaning towards 3 but don't feel strongly about 2-4.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading issue #754 for the listed shared features between Server-to-Server and Canonical VCI. Compare the four proposed document structures and assess how each supports shared primitives and context-specific usage. Done means agreeing on the document structure before S2S Implementors Draft 1.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- backend-api-design
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100