do we need `mandatory` in VCI metadata?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 125
- Forks
- 41
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Is there any use case for using a `mandatory` set to `false` (or absent)? I.e. is including a _claims description object_ for a given claim path with `mandatory` set to `false` (or absent) the same as not including that _claims description object_?
Originally posted by @pmhsfelix in https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/pull/276#discussion_r1882374777
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the claims description object and the mandatory question in PR #276, including the linked discussion. Determine whether the specification needs a clarified rule or change for mandatory set to false or omitted; done means the semantics are resolved and documented in the relevant specification text.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- api
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100