opengeospatial / opengeospatial/ogcapi-processes
Could OGC API - Processes - Part 1 v2.0 use the same PubSub approach as OGC API - EDR?
@pvretano is already working on this.
Since Nov 7, 2023.
- Dominant language
- AsciiDoc
- Stars
- 63
- Forks
- 46
- Avg merge
- 2d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 8
Description
This topic came up during the OGC October 2023 Open Standards Code Sprint.
The EDR API SWG is currently working on a PubSub extension for OGC API - EDR that is envisaged to form the basis for a OGC API-wide approach.
Given that OGC API - Processes - Part 1 includes a callback mechanism. There is a suggestion that the PubSub approach being taken by OGC API - EDR could be applied to the future version 2.0 of OGC API - Processes - Part 1: Core.
This GitHub Issue is intended to capture the views and discussion points on this topic.
The GitHub Issue can be closed once the SWG reaches a decision on whether OGC API - Processes - Part 1 v2.0 could use the same PubSub approach as OGC API - EDR. Ideally the decision would be formalised via a SWG Motion.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.