CQL2 grammar: BNF definition of function

Hello,

I am currently building an implementation of the CQL2-Text spec and had a question about the current definition of the function rule in the BNF schema.

https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-features/blob/64e26b624a052510b7d10e93b304cad0e5b30194/cql2/standard/schema/cql2.bnf#L355

Based on the rest of the schema, you seem to be using the { ... } brace syntax to signify "1 or more". So, from my current understanding, wouldn't the current rule imply that something like function(arga1, arga2, arga3 <space> argb1, argb2, ...) is valid, with more than one argument list provided?

The closest similar rule I could find is isInListPredicate:

https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-features/blob/64e26b624a052510b7d10e93b304cad0e5b30194/cql2/standard/schema/cql2.bnf#L101

Here, the inList rule appears without braces and the resulting rule when substituted would be a single instance of scalarExpression [ {"," scalarExpression} ]

I'm wondering whether the argumentList in function should have its braces removed, giving something like:

- function = identifier "(" {argumentList} ")";
+ function = identifier "(" argumentList ")";

# When substituted, this gives:
function = identifier "(" argument [ { "," argument } ] ")";

Thanks in advance!