opengeospatial / opengeospatial/CRS-JSON-Encoding
Definition of "ordinal_cs" (missing)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Makefile
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 2
- Avg merge
- 1h 36m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
NOTE: Markdown does not support highlighting in color, so bold/italic has been used to highlight the material being discussed. This issue is extracted from the document submitted by Roger Lott at https://github.com/opengeospatial/CRS-JSON-Encoding/blob/main/ProjJson%20v0-7%20RL%202024-06-16.docx for discussion at the CRS SWG meeting OGC held during the Montreal June 2024 TC meeting.
"ordinal_cs": { }
"$comment": "[RL] Definition to be completed. The definition would constrain an ordinal CS to have axes with integer coordinates (so no units)."
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked ProjJson v0-7 RL 2024-06-16.docx and the existing "ordinal_cs": {} entry. Compare it with surrounding coordinate-system definitions and determine the agreed wording and constraints for ordinal axes, including integer coordinates and the absence of units. Done means the missing definition is agreed and recorded in the CRS-JSON specification.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- json
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100