openai / openai/codex

Possible overcounting of Codex weekly usage

Open
#44,685 3 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

bug CLI rate-limits windows-os
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
125k
Forks
19.4k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

Possible overcounting of Codex weekly usage

My weekly Codex allowance went from 0% to 100% between September 10, 2026, 17:07:59 CEST and September 11, 2026, approximately 02:00 CEST — less than nine hours.

Environment

  • ChatGPT self-serve Business workspace Premium PLAN
  • Codex CLI 0.154.0 on Windows
  • GPT-5.6 Sol
  • Standard service tier; Fast mode was not enabled
  • 11 user sessions and 8 subagent sessions

Local Codex telemetry

  • 306,015,436 input tokens
  • 300,207,488 cached input tokens
  • 733,962 output tokens
  • 2,499 token-count events
  • Server meter progression: 0% → 19% → 30% → 50% → 99% → 100%

At the published GPT-5.6 Sol rates, this is approximately 3,950 credits. Please audit the server-side usage ledger for this weekly window and verify:

  1. Whether cached input was charged at the cached-input rate.
  2. Whether concurrent sessions or subagents were double-counted.
  3. Whether repeated context during internal tool loops is intentionally charged for every model invocation.
  4. The exact request-level credit calculation that exhausted the weekly allowance.

My comparable workload in Claude Code using Sonnet normally exhausts its weekly allowance after approximately three days, including four or five concurrent sessions. Exhausting Codex in less than nine hours is therefore unexpectedly high.

I can provide sanitized aggregates and session IDs, but cannot share raw session transcripts because they contain confidential code and business data.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The issue names no repository files, tests, or entry points. Start by determining whether Codex CLI contains the usage-metering path or whether the reported ledger is server-side; reproduce the meter progression if possible and compare request-level accounting, cached-input treatment, and concurrent-session handling against the documented behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
analytics, cli
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.