GPT-6 Astra: repeated "Selected model is at capacity" on Pro 20x — rollout logs show server_overloaded with 0% usage used
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 125k
- Forks
- 19.4k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
What version of the Codex App are you using (From “About Codex” dialog)?
Codex Desktop (bundled codex-cli 0.153.4)
What subscription do you have?
ChatGPT Pro (20x)
What platform is your computer?
Darwin 25.5.0 arm64 (Apple Silicon Mac, macOS)
What issue are you seeing?
Codex Desktop repeatedly terminates turns with:
Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.
Model: gpt-6-astra. This has been recurring since Aug 28 and escalated sharply on Sep 7–8.
Local rollout JSONL logs classify all of these terminations as:
"codex_error_info": "server_overloaded"
while the rate-limit snapshots in the same logs show the account is nowhere near any limit:
plan_type: pro
used_percent: 0.0
rate_limit_reached_type: null
Measured from my local rollout logs:
| Date (UTC) | Occurrences | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 28 | 39 banner lines / 30 server_overloaded |
single day |
| Sep 7 | 65 server_overloaded across 5 sessions |
worst session: 27 terminal errors between 07:14–12:27 UTC |
| Sep 8 | 6 server_overloaded between 03:02–04:38 UTC |
today |
Important detail: turns are not rejected upfront — they are admitted, run for a while, then killed mid-flight. In the Sep 7 session the killed turns ran on average 85 s before termination (max 275 s), losing in-progress work on long-running tasks.
Retrying succeeds intermittently, then fails again in bursts. Switching models and starting new sessions does not reliably recover.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
- Sign in with a ChatGPT Pro account (auth via ChatGPT, not API key) in Codex Desktop 0.153.4 on macOS arm64.
- Select
gpt-6-astra. - Start normal coding tasks.
- Turns intermittently terminate with the capacity banner; the rollout log records
codex_error_info: "server_overloaded"whileused_percentstays at 0.0.
Session IDs for server-side correlation:
01a07ab7-4da3-7cf0-b711-638991ba5df0(Sep 7, 27 terminal errors, 07:14–12:27 UTC)01a07ef7-1841-70e0-9344-a8d33ad34714(Sep 8, 6 terminal errors, 03:02–04:38 UTC)
What is the expected behavior?
- The UI message should distinguish server-side capacity / admission-control failures from per-account quota exhaustion — "Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model." reads like quota guidance, but my quota was at 0% used and switching models does not help.
- Long-running turns should be retried with bounded backoff within the same turn (or resume from a preserved state) instead of being killed mid-flight after minutes of work.
- status.openai.com showed "fully operational" with 100% Codex uptime during these windows; Codex-side regional serving degradation is not reflected there.
Additional information
- The escalation timing coincides with the global paid-usage reset on the evening of Sep 7 (PST); community reports consistently spike right after each reset, which is consistent with a demand surge against fixed serving capacity rather than per-account throttling.
- Community reports suggest Asia/Singapore-serving-region users are hit especially hard, and some users report a VPN region switch mitigates it — which points at regional serving pools.
- This matches the patterns already reported in #41790, #43398, #43663, #43375, #43517 — filing with my own telemetry/session IDs for correlation; happy for maintainers to merge into an existing tracking issue.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No source file or test is named. Start by examining the rollout JSONL entries for server_overloaded alongside plan_type, used_percent, and rate_limit_reached_type, then trace the entry point that produces the capacity banner. Compare the behavior with issues #41790, #43398, #43663, #43375, and #43517; done requires a decided handling for mid-flight failures and clearer capacity-versus-quota messaging.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- macos
- Domain
- backend, distributed-systems, infrastructure
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100