openai / openai/codex

Suspected false positive interrupted authorized local code review

Open
#43,567 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

bug code-review safety-check
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
125k
Forks
19.4k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

I am following up on feedback submitted September 6, 2026.

Feedback ID: 01a07513-67bd-7fc1-84cd-a8464facd95f

Codex on macOS, using GPT-6 Astra with Extra High reasoning, displayed “This content can’t be shown” during an authorized review of my own local Symphony development-coordination utility.

The task covered code correctness and defensive validation using isolated local test fixtures. Its scope prohibited network access, credentials, production changes, deployment, activation, and task dispatch.

Existing logs confirm 237 passing scenarios and 10,551 assertions. Supplemental validation was interrupted before its hypothesis was established. The review was closed as incomplete, reviewer temporary material was cleaned up, and evidence was preserved. The candidate remains unadopted and inactive.

Please review the diagnostics associated with this feedback ID and confirm:

  • Whether this was an expected restriction or a false positive.
  • The supported way to complete the remaining authorized review.
  • Whether specific access approval is required for this task and product surface.

Please provide a follow-up reference if a separate support case is needed.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files, tests, or code entry points are identified. Start by reviewing the diagnostics associated with feedback ID 01a07513-67bd-7fc1-84cd-a8464facd95f and determine whether the interruption was expected or a false positive. Done means confirming the restriction, documenting the supported completion path, and identifying any required access approval or follow-up support case.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
devtools
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.