openai / openai/codex

Codex rejects MCP tool results containing a resource_link (MCP Apps) with "Unexpected response type"

Open
#41,280 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

app bug mcp tool-calls
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
125k
Forks
19.4k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

Summary

When a tool result contains a resource_link content block (the io.modelcontextprotocol/ui MCP Apps extension), Codex fails the whole call with Unexpected response type. A result without it works. The resource_link block is the only variable.

Environment

  • Codex Desktop 0.150.0-alpha.8 (also observed on ChatGPT desktop 26.820.60940)
  • rmcp =3.1.3 (per codex-rs/Cargo.toml)
  • Server negotiates protocol 2025-11-25

Reproduce

Minimal, zero-dependency Node stdio server (101 lines): https://github.com/ahonn/codex-mcp-apps-repro

git clone https://github.com/ahonn/codex-mcp-apps-repro
# ~/.codex/config.toml
[mcp_servers.appsrepro]
command = "node"
args = ["/absolute/path/to/codex-mcp-apps-repro/server.js"]

Start a session and call each tool:

  • plain_tool -> { "content": [ { "type": "text" } ], "isError": false }
  • view_tool -> fails ❌:
tool call failed for `appsrepro/view_tool`

Caused by:
    Unexpected response type

The two tools differ only in the result: view_tool appends one resource_link block.

Triggering result (spec-valid)

{
  "content": [
    { "type": "text", "text": "result with a view" },
    { "type": "resource_link", "uri": "ui://demo/view/v1", "mimeType": "text/html;profile=mcp-app" }
  ],
  "isError": false
}

Expected vs actual

  • Expected: the result is accepted; the resource_link block is handled or ignored.
  • Actual: the call fails with rmcp ServiceError::UnexpectedResponse.

Analysis

Unexpected response type is rmcp's ServiceError::UnexpectedResponse, raised client-side when a ServerResult does not match CallToolResult. However, rmcp 3.1.3 deserializes this response without issue: a standalone rmcp 3.1.3 client, via both call_tool and the manual send_request + match ServerResult::CallToolResult path used for pre-2026-07-28 servers, accepts it and returns [text, resource_link]. So the defect appears to be in the layer that consumes tool results, not in rmcp_client deserialization. The server advertises the io.modelcontextprotocol/ui extension in initialize, and view_tool returns a spec-valid resource_link.

Impact

Any MCP server exposing MCP Apps content is unusable from Codex for its UI-bound tools. A server-side workaround is to stop advertising the ui extension to Codex.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by running the linked zero-dependency Node server and compare plain_tool with view_tool. Trace Codex’s MCP tool-result consumption after rmcp 3.1.3 deserializes the response, especially the call_tool and manual send_request paths described in the issue. Done means a spec-valid resource_link no longer causes Unexpected response type while plain results remain working.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
node.js, rust
Domain
api, backend
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.