Critical Codex data-loss incident — compensation requested
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 125k
- Forks
- 19.4k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
What version of Codex CLI is running?
codex 0.149.1
What subscription do you have?
Pro x20
Which model were you using?
sol ultra
What platform is your computer?
Windows 11 x64
What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?
No response
Codex doctor report
What issue are you seeing?
Critical Codex data-loss incident — compensation requested
On August 23, 2026, during a Codex Heavy-route goal, a Codex subagent
executed a malformed Windows rmdir command intended only for a
pycache directory. Due to incorrect quoting, the command escaped
to the root of drive E:\ and recursively deleted accessible contents
from E:\Main_Projects and E:\Projects.The command ran approximately from 23:07:43 to 23:18:44 Europe/
Bucharest. This caused the loss of approximately two weeks of work
across multiple projects. The files bypassed the Recycle Bin.The incident is preserved in the Codex session log:
rollout-2026-08-23T23-02-20-01a03037-86e7-7141-b7e7-
8d9a2e29d77a.jsonlSession evidence SHA-256:
21e18da945a41b12a55f17a90816f81a6099f599d60cc6738097f6c4212f426dI request:
- Immediate escalation to the Codex safety/engineering team.
- A full reset of my banked Codex usage.
- Account credits or an appropriate refund/compensation.
- A written incident/case number.
- Confirmation that the malformed destructive-command behavior will
be investigated.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Uploaded thread: 01a031f9-a65f-7141-82c5-c27b20d06c32
What is the expected behavior?
No response
Additional information
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the uploaded thread and the named Codex session log, rollout-2026-08-23T23-02-20-01a03037-86e7-7141-b7e7-8d9a2e29d77a.jsonl. No repository file or test is identified, and the expected behavior is not stated; done would require a confirmed engineering investigation of the malformed destructive command and its safety implications.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- cli, operating-systems, security
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100