Security safeguards are overbearing
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 125k
- Forks
- 19.4k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
What version of Codex CLI is running?
codex-cli 0.149.0
What subscription do you have?
Pro
Which model were you using?
gpt-5.6-sol
What platform is your computer?
Linux 6.18.7-76061807-generic aarch64 aarch64
What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?
GNU bash, version 5.2.21(1)-release (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Codex doctor report
What issue are you seeing?
Security blocked on software I've been writing for years.
What steps can reproduce the bug?
Uploaded thread: 01a02bc5-8160-70c0-86cb-854b98913346
What is the expected behavior?
Codex audits my code and helps me harden it before I pay a bunch of money to an external auditor who's just going to run Claude and a bunch of skills.
Additional information
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The payload names no source file, test, or entry point. Start by reviewing uploaded thread 01a02bc5-8160-70c0-86cb-854b98913346 and reproducing the block with codex-cli 0.149.0 on Linux; done should establish and verify the expected behavior for this security safeguard.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- bash, linux, rust
- Domain
- cli, security
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100