Value for Money

I am a paying ChatGPT Plus user. I requested an uncommon, authentic and well-researched academic assignment, but the result was substantively similar to a generic document produced for someone using the free version. Although the formatting was polished, the intellectual content was conventional and did not reflect my explicit request for originality. This makes the paid subscription feel poor in value and discourages me from renewing. Please review this conversation and improve quality differentiation, instruction-following and originality checks for paid long-form document generation.

The same applies to analysis of Calculations i need to literally use the work version(5.6 Sol High) i can't use (5.6 Sol/Tera/Luna light) to get right answers
The same with Image generation, the quality is higher on the free version than my version

Please be fair I literally try to show am a paid user and get discouraged alot saying a free person benefits more
The coding is fair cause I pay for Gemini that is slightly better, but I do appreciate
And the limits dont work on me which is ok

But fix those issues..Thank yoy

Concrete_and_Cement_Types_Assignment-8.pdf

Start by reviewing the conversation referenced by the reporter and the attached Concrete_and_Cement_Types_Assignment-8.pdf. The issue names no repository files, tests, or implementation entry point; completion would require an agreed definition and evaluation of quality differentiation across long-form generation, calculations, and image generation.